Drawing for ASPEKT

USPTO serial 90531242

ASPEKT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACDOUGALL, KIERRA RYNNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASPEKT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julianne A. Henley

Julianne A. Henley Sparrow IP PLLC1567 Highlands Drive NE, Suite 110-290ISSAQUAH, WA 98029UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter and paper goods, namely, fiction books featuring characters from animated, action adventure, comedy, video game, and/or drama features, comic books, anthology books of video game characters, children's books, magazines featuring characters from animated, action adventure, video game, comedy and/or drama features, coloring books, children's activity booksACTIVE—
041movie, television show, video and animation production servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 19, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance