USPTO serial 90533875
SHANTELL LAW LEGAL SERVICES FOR SOPHISTICATED BUSINESS OWNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURCH, JILLIAN RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHANTELL LAW LEGAL SERVICES FOR SOPHISTICATED BUSINESS OWNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Candice S Patrick
Candice S Patrick SHANTELL LAW, PLLCPO BOX 793351DALLAS, TX 75379UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Providing legal services in all fields, customized legal information, counseling, and advice, intellectual property services, contract drafting and reviewing, entity setup, namely, limited liability companies and corporations, and litigation services in the field of business, corporate, family, and personal injury | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |