USPTO serial 90534217
TASTE BEYOND BELIEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TASTE BEYOND BELIEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin S. Cornuelle
Kristin S. Cornuelle ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLPIP PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT2050 MAIN STREET, SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat substitutes; vegan and vegetarian meat substitutes; plant-based meat substitutes; Refrigerated food package combinations consisting primarily of meat substitutes, vegan and vegetarian meat substitutes, plant-based meat substitutes or processed vegetables for purposes of creating a sandwich; packaged meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes, vegan and vegetarian meat substitutes, plant-based meat substitutes or vegetables; frozen meals consisting primarily of vegetables; prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables; ready to eat meals consisting primarily of vegetables; packaged meals consisting primarily of vegetables; prepared food kits composed of meat substitutes, vegan and vegetarian meat substitutes, plant-based meat substitutes, sauces or seasonings, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal; prepared, packaged and frozen meals consisting of meat substitutes, vegan and vegetarian meat substitutes, and plant-based meat substitutes; chili; frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat substitutes, vegan and vegetarian meat substitutes or plant-based meat substitutes; prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat substitutes, vegan and vegetarian meat substitutes or plant-based meat substitutes; packaged and pre-packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat substitutes, vegan and vegetarian meat substitutes or plant-based meat substitutes; vegetable-based snack foods containing meat substitutes, vegan or vegetarian meat substitutes or plant-based meat substitutes; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables, soups, fruit salads and vegetable salads; prepared vegetarian meals consisting primarily of fruits, nuts, seeds, and vegetables; Soup mixes; prepared meals consisting primarily of fruits, nuts, seeds and vegetables; Fruit-based, nut-based and vegetable-based meal replacement bars which contain protein; fruit-based, nut-based and vegetable-based nutritional and dietary bars for use as a meal replacement which contain protein; Fruit based organic food bars, fruit based organic food bars also containing vegetables, nuts, and seeds; processed fruit-based and vegetable-based nutrient dense food bars which contain protein, processed nut based food bars, processed nut and seed based snack food bars; Nut-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |