USPTO serial 90534559
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Begler
Jay Begler NIESAR & VESTAL LLP90 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET,, NINTH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leathers; bags; handbags; holdalls; clutches; rucksacks; sports bags; boot bags; casual bags; waist bags; tote bags; satchels; belts; wallets; purses; credit card holders; billfolds; money belts; card holders; cheque book holders; umbrellas; parasols; trunks being luggage, cases; travelling bags; brief cases; key holders; key cases; wash bags; drawstring cloth bags; tie cases; gift bags; shopping bags; luggage; knapsacks; beach bags; school bags; sheet music bags; suit cases; cases for musical instruments; vanity cases; pocket books; attaché cases; credit card cases; business card cases; key cases; walking sticks; whips; harness and saddlery; leather laces; leather straps; leather tassels; collars for pets; parts, fittings and accessories for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Footwear; shoes; ladies' footwear; children's footwear; men's footwear; leather shoes; vinyl shoes; esparto shoes; esparto sandals; rubber shoes; low shoes; straw shoes; rain shoes; over shoes; bath slippers; bath sandals; galoshes; heels; lace boots; half boots; boots; beach shoes; sandals; slippers; clogs; espadrilles; mules; moccasins; ballerina pumps; trainers; sneakers; deck shoes; boat shoes; snowboots; inner soles; soles for footwear; footwear uppers; heel pieces for boots and shoes; tips for footwear; fittings of metal for boots and shoes; non-slipping devices for boots and shoes; lace-up boots; soles; wooden shoes; clothing, namely, trousers, shorts, shirts, skirts, dresses, sweaters, blouses, ladies' tops, men's tops, children's tops, jackets, blazers, bathrobes, coats, overcoats, raincoats, capes, stormcoats, trench coats, gillets; headgear; scarves; gloves; socks; tights; hosiery; swimwear; belts for wear; parts, fittings and accessories for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |