CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BALTIMORE PHOENIX

USPTO serial 90535431

BALTIMORE PHOENIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MASON, JARED MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALTIMORE PHOENIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Volante

RICHARD VOLANTE THE VOLANTE LAW FIRM LLC1900 SUPERIOR AVE E, STE 306CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, professional basketball games rendered live in a stadium, and through the media of television and radio and via the internet; provision of entertainment in the nature of online non-downloadable pre-recorded film clips from basketball games, practices, and exhibitions, presented via mobile communication devices; provision of news and information in the field of basketball via the internet and mobile devices; provision of entertainment in the nature of development, creation, production and post- production services of multimedia entertainment content in the nature of scripted and unscripted programming about basketball gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance