Drawing for ADOC

USPTO serial 90536186

ADOC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADOC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline Tadros

Jacqueline Tadros JACQUELINE TADROS, P.A.P.O. BOX 4564FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33338UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable webinars in the fields of IT operations, software development and information securityACTIVE—
035Professional association services, namely, promoting the interests of IT professionals and cyber security professionalsACTIVE—
041Conducting industry research, namely, conducting research in the field of education for IT professionals and security professionals; providing live and virtual training, workshops, non- downloadable webinars, e-learning in the nature of non- downloadable video-based online virtual seminars and virtual workshops, and educational conferences in the fields of IT operations, software development and information security; E-learning, namely, providing a website featuring non-downloadable instructional videos in the field of IT operations, software development and information security; Conducting of live and virtual business conferences in the field of IT operations, software development and information securityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 23, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2021GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 5, 2021GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 5, 2021CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 14, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance