USPTO serial 90537662
AEIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Breitman
Eric Breitman Greenspoon Marder LLP590 Madison Avenue, Suite 1800NEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; Fragrances; Toothpaste; Deodorant for personal use; Deodorants and antiperspirants; Deodorants for body care; Deodorants for human beings; Fragranced body care preparations, namely, shower gels; Fragrances and perfumery; Fragrances for personal use; Hair color; Hair colorants; Hair colouring; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair gel; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair mousses; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hand cream; Hand creams; Moisturizing creams; Moisturizing body lotions; Moisturizing preparations for the skin; Moisturizing solutions for the skin; Shampoo-conditioners; Shampoos; Shave creams; Shaving cream; Shaving creams; Toilet soaps; Toothpastes; After sun moisturisers; After-shave creams; Aftershave moisturising cream; Anti-aging moisturizer; Anti-aging moisturizers used as cosmetics; Antiperspirant soap; Bar soap; Bath soaps; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Body spray used as a personal deodorant and as fragrance; Cosmetic hand creams; Cosmetic soaps; Deodorant soap; Facial moisturizers; Fragranced face care preparations, namely, facial moisturizers; Fragranced facial moisturizer; Fragranced skin care preparations, namely, skin moisturizers; Liquid bath soaps; Natural soap bars; Non-medicated shampoos for dandruff care; Non-medicated soaps; Perfumed soaps; Personal deodorants; Pre-shave creams; Room fragrances; Shaving soap; Shaving soaps; Shaving spritz in the nature of a moisturizing solution for shaving; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizers used as cosmetics; Skin moisturizing gel; Skin soap; Toilet soap | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2023 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 2, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |