USPTO serial 90538098
FLOURCHILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAYCEDO, CATHERINE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLOURCHILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY L. KOELLER
Gregory L. Koeller SKAAR ULBRICH MACARI, P.A.601 CARLSON PARKWAYSUITE 1050MINNETONKA, MN 55305Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Restaurants; Pop-up restaurant services; Take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 3, 2025 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |