USPTO serial 90544720
QUALITY TASTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNING, KATHRYN ELISABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUALITY TASTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM A. WOOTEN
WILLIAM A. WOOTEN WOOTEN LAW OFFICE120 COURT SQUARE EASTCOVINGTON, TN 38019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Bourbon; Brandy; Champagne; Gin; Rum; Whisky produced in Scotland to specific standards; Vodka; Whiskey; Wine; Alcoholic beverages containing fruit; Alcoholic beverages, except beer; Alcoholic carbonated beverages, except beer; Alcoholic coffee-based beverage; Alcoholic flavored brewed malt beverages, except beers; Alcoholic fruit beverages; Alcoholic malt beverages, except beers; Alcoholic mixed beverages except beers; Alcoholic tea-based beverage; Bourbon whisky; Brandy spirits; Liquor; Liquor in ice cream form; Liquor in whipped cream form; Rum; Rum infused with vitamins; Rum punch; Rum-based beverages; Spirits; Spirits and liqueurs; Whiskey spirits; Wine punch; Wine punches; Wine spritzers; Wine-based drinks; Wines; Wines and fortified wines; Wines and liqueurs; Wines and sparkling wines; Alcoholic beverages, namely, flavor-infused whiskey; Black raspberry wine (Bokbunjaju); Blended spirits; Cherry brandy; Chinese brewed liquor (laojiou); Chinese white liquor (baiganr); Corn whiskey; Dessert wines; Distilled spirits; Distilled agave liquor; Distilled blue agave liquor; Flavored liquors; Flavored malt-based alcoholic beverages, excluding beers; Flavored tonic liquors; French brandy; Fruit wine; Grain-based distilled alcoholic beverages; Grape brandy distilled in the Armagnac region of France in compliance with the laws and regulations of the French Government; Grape brandy distilled in the Cognac region of France in compliance with the laws and regulations of the French Government; Grape wine; Hard seltzer; Honey wine; Irish whiskey; Japanese white liquor (shochu); Mulled wine; Natural sparkling wines; Pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; Prepared wine cocktails; Prepared cocktails consisting primarily of distilled spirits and also including beer; Red wine; Red wines; Rose wine; Rose wines; Shochu (spirits); Sparkling wines; Sparkling fruit wine; Sparkling grape wine; Sparkling red wines; Sparkling white wines; Strawberry wine; Sugar cane juice rum; Sugarcane-based alcoholic beverages; Sweet wines; Tonic liquor containing herb extracts (homeishu); Tonic sweet grape wine containing extracts from ginseng and conchona bark (ninjin-kinatetsu wine); White wine; White wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |