USPTO serial 90547094
WEAVE ACADEMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERTRAND, JOSEPH A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEAVE ACADEMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Courtney Jackson
Courtney Jackson Armstrong Teasdale LLP7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1800St. Louis, MO 63105United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable webinars in the field of academic and administrative institutional and organizational effectiveness, academic and administrative planning, education, quality improvement processes, and professional development; downloadable webinars in the field of academic and administrative institutional and organizational effectiveness, namely, accreditation, institutional, program, and course level assessment, strategy planning, credential management, program review, and curriculum design and mapping; downloadable educational course materials and e-books in the field of academic and administrative institutional and organizational effectiveness, academic and administrative planning, education, quality improvement processes, and professional development; downloadable course materials and e-books in the field of academic and administrative institutional and organizational effectiveness, namely, accreditation, institutional, program, and course level assessment, strategy planning, credential management, program review, and curriculum design and mapping | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2024 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 23, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |