Drawing for ERTHCOMPATIBLE EC

USPTO serial 90550414

ERTHCOMPATIBLE EC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EBAUGH, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ERTHCOMPATIBLE EC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles Runyan

Charles Runyan ERTHOS, INC.20 E. UNIVERSITY DRIVESUITE 308TEMPE, AZ 85281

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Brackets of metal for building; Non-electric cables and wires of common metals; Non-electrical cables and wires of common metalACTIVE—
007Electrical and electronic apparatus and equipment all for use in generating energy obtained from alternative energy sources; Industrial robotsACTIVE—
009Cables for electrical and optical signal transmission systems; Cables for electrical or optical signal transmission; Cables, electric; Computer hardware and recorded software system for remotely monitoring environmental conditions and controlling devices within a building, facility, grounds, or designated spatial area; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for power plants; Industrial automation controls; Photovoltaic cells and modules; Photovoltaic inverters; Photovoltaic solar modules for production of electricity; Downloadable industrial process control softwareACTIVE—
019Concrete; Brackets, not of metal, for building; Concrete building materials, namely, blocks, borders, curbsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 4, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 21, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 26, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 19, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2021MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 28, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance