USPTO serial 90556053
OXEFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OXEFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pensacola, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL W. DUBNER
MICHAEL W. DUBNER FOLEY & LARDNER LLPDALLAS IP SECTION2021 MCKINNEY AVENUE, SUITE 1600DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software in the nature of an application for use by individuals participating in exercise classes, physical training, and exercise instruction for developing and implementing personal activity and exercise plans, and training goals, in each case, for use in connection with exercise and physical fitness equipment, namely, upper and lower body cardiovascular conditioning machines and weight lifting machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Streaming of audio and video materials on the Internet, namely, streaming of audio and video materials on the Internet featuring physical fitness classes, training, and instruction for use in connection with exercise and physical fitness equipment, namely upper and lower body cardiovascular conditioning machines and weight lifting machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing classes, workshops and seminars in the fields of fitness and exercise; physical fitness instruction and consultation; physical fitness conditioning classes; physical fitness training services; providing a website featuring information on exercise and physical fitness accessible through a global computer network and mobile devices; providing non-downloadable playback of audiovisual content featuring physical fitness classes, training and instruction via a global communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing, displaying, managing and recording statistical data, goals, information, programs and metrics in the fields of exercise and physical fitness, in each case for use with exercise and physical fitness equipment, namely upper and lower body cardiovascular conditioning machines and weight lifting machines; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software to assist the user with exercise and physical fitness for use in connection with exercise and physical fitness equipment, namely, upper and lower body cardiovascular conditioning machines and weight lifting machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | On-line social networking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |