USPTO serial 90558815
NO HARD FEELINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO HARD FEELINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mount Eden Auckland, NZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells LEGENDS LAW GROUP, PLLC330 MAIN STREETKAYSVILLE, UT 84037United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, shirts, shorts, skirts, sweaters, hooded sweatshirts, pants, socks, swimsuits, socks, jackets, coats, hats, caps; footwear | ACTIVE | Oct 21, 2019 |
| 028 | (Based on 44(e)) Bags especially designed for skis and surfboards; Surfboard covers; Surfboard leashes; Surfboards; Bodyboards; Skateboards; Skimboards; Wake boards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |