USPTO serial 90559353
TERRATEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TERRATEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONTERREY, NUEVO LEON, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker BAKER AND RANNELLS, PA92 E. MAIN STREETSUITE 302SOMERVILLE, NJ 08876Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | ACCESSORIES FOR MOTOR VEHICLES, NAMELY, LAND VEHICLE COUPLINGS, VEHICLE SPOILERS, VEHICLE SEAT SAFETY HARNESSES, VEHICLE SEATS, VEHICLE BASKET SEATS, VEHICLE ROLLBARS, VEHICLE CHASSIS, LAND VEHICLE FENDERS, VEHICLE ORGANIZER BOXES, NAMELY, ROOF BOXES FOR VEHICLES, VEHICLE MUDGUARDS, VEHICLE SKID PLATES, VEHICLE DOORS, OFF-ROAD VEHICLES; COUPLINGS FOR OFF-ROAD VEHICLES; LAND VEHICLE FENDERS; AUTOMOBILE WINDSHIELD SUNSHADES; AUTOMOBILE WINDSHIELDS; MOTOR CAR DOORS; ROOF PANELS FOR LAND VEHICLES; CHASSIS FOR AUTOMOBILES; BASKETS ADAPTED FOR BICYCLES; PROTECTORS, NAMELY, RUNNING BOARDS FOR VEHICLES; VEHICLE RUNNING BOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |