Drawing for EMPOWER MOBILITY

USPTO serial 90562481

EMPOWER MOBILITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMPOWER MOBILITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathleen E. Stadecker

Cathleen E. Stadecker DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREET, PO BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software development tools; Downloadable computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces; Downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for collecting, editing, organizing, transmitting, modifying, storing, and sharing of text, images, and dataACTIVE
042Computer software development in the field of mobile applications; Design and development of software in the field of mobile applications; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for software development; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for collecting, editing, organizing, transmitting, modifying, storing, and sharing of text, images, and dataACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 8, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 8, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 30, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 30, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 30, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 16, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 16, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 24, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 15, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 13, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 13, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 13, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 4, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 9, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance