Drawing for BURNTFIELDS

USPTO serial 90562562

BURNTFIELDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DYER, ERIN ZASKODA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BURNTFIELDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD I. SOBELMAN

Howard I. Sobelman Snell & Wilmer LLPOne East Washington StreetSuite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services, namely, consulting in the field of environmental assessment; consulting in the field of health risk assessment, namely, prediction and assessment of health risks to public and private agencies, facilities, individuals and locations following an accidental or terrorist caused release of chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear materials; Emergency response services, namely, emergency environmental testing and inspection services; emergency response services, namely, emergency engineering services in the field of reducing combustion gas temperature; emergency response services, namely, emergency engine restoration design services; emergency response services, namely, emergency construction drafting; quality evaluation services in the field of engineering; computer-aided design services; Construction drafting; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software programs and applications for use in managing systems operations; providing temporary use of nondownloadable computer software programs and applications for use in managing, monitoring and evaluating data in the field of construction, remediation, restoration and waste management; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software programs and applications for use in detecting data errors; Consulting services, namely, habitat restoration design consulting in the field of wetland preservationACTIVEApr 25, 2023

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 5, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 18, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 6, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2023CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Apr 26, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 25, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 25, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 21, 2023RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Mar 21, 2023RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2023RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Feb 1, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 30, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2023CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2022CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 11, 2022SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 11, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 3, 2022IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 3, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2022EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 26, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 9, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2021TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Aug 16, 2021PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2021AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2021PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance