USPTO serial 90564301
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Monica, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yael Rouach Cabilly
Yael Rouach Cabilly Cabilly & Co.101 West 67 Streetc/o CabillyNew York, NY 10023| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Back scratchers; Barbecue tongs; Barbecue turners; Bath products, namely, body sponges; Beer jugs; Beverage glassware; Bird cages; Bottle stands; Bottles, sold empty; Boxes of glass; Bread boxes; Brushes for cleaning musical instruments; Bulb basters; Cake moulds; Cake pans; Candy jars sold empty; Car washing mitts; Caviar coolers; Ceramic figurines; Champagne buckets; Cheese covers; Cheese graters; Chocolate molds; Clay pots; Cocktail picks; Cocktail strainers; Coffee cups; Coffee stirrers; Combs; Cookie molds; Cooking pot sets; Creamer pitchers; Crumb brushes; Crushers for kitchen use, non-electric; Decorative plates; Dental flossers; Dish covers; Dishes; Dishware; Double wall cups; Drinking cups for infants and parts and fittings therefor, namely, valves and lids sold as a unit; Drinking glasses; Electric face cleansing brushes; Empty popcorn tins for household use; Empty spray bottles; Eyelash brushes; Facial sponges for applying make-up; Flower vases; Fondue pots without heat source; Garden syringes; Glass beverageware; Glass bowls; Glass carafes; Glass dishes; Grooming tools for pets, namely, combs and brushes; Hair combs; Honey dippers; Household containers for foods; Household storage containers for pet food; Ice cube molds; Ice cube molds for refrigerators; Ice pails; Insulated containers for food or beverages; Jugs; Juice strainers; Lids with drinking spouts for reusable water bottles; Manual toothbrushes; Mixing bowls; Mixing spoons; Muffin pans; Muffin tins; Mugs of precious metal; Multipurpose wiping cloth for use with infants and toddlers; Mushroom brushes; Mustard pots; Non-electric coffee makers; Non-electric crushers for kitchen use; Oral hygiene devices, namely, interdental cleaners; Ovenware; Paint buckets; Paper cooking pots; Paper plates and paper cups; Pasta serving forks; Pastry bags; Pastry rollers; Pet brushes; Pet feeding dishes; Pet litter box liners; Pie pans; Pillar candle plates; Plastic buckets; Plastic juice box holders; Plastic plates; Polishing cloths; Porcelain mugs; Preserve glasses; Rags for cleaning; Salad bowls; Salt shakers; Sandwich molds; Sauna buckets; Scoops for household purposes; Serving spoons; Shaker bottles sold empty; Silicone baking cups; Small jugs; Soap containers; Soap holders; Sugar bowls; Tea infusers; Tea sets; Tea strainers; Terra cotta figurines; Terrariums for plants; Toilet brushes; Tooth brush cases; Toothbrush head covers; Toothpick holders; Towel rails; Travel mugs; Tub brushes; Vacuum bottle stoppers specially adapted for use with wine bottles; Whisks; Wine bottle cradles; Wine coasters of precious metal; Wine glasses; Wine strainers | ACTIVE | Feb 7, 2021 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 26, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |