USPTO serial 90565903
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Linderman
John C. Linderman MCCORMICK, PAULDING & HUBER PLLC185 ASYLUM STREETCITYPLACE II, 18TH FLOORHARTFORD, CT 06103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Land development advisory services, including developing community plans that serve as a blueprint to develop and guide local decision making in areas such as natural resources preservation, economic development, housing, land use, and public services, and developing master plans for airports with evaluation of impacts to natural and cultural resources within the environment that may be impacted by airport terminal and runway improvement projects | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2021 |
| 042 | Transportation, transit, and traffic planning services including developing plans that involve government agencies, organizations and the public for a comprehensive look at existing and future transportation needs; conducting community engagement/liaison and data collection services for increasing public awareness and encouraging involvement from the public in transportation planning, collecting qualitative and quantitative data for purposes of analyzing and evaluating planning aspects of transportation projects; and consulting on environmental regulatory matters pertaining to the transportation plans; developing plans for bus operations, shuttle service operations, and transit coordination and policy; assessing, evaluating, and recommending safe operations for the movement of people and vehicles within transportation systems, operational planning and visual simulation of the transportation infrastructure and facilities; assessing bicycle and pedestrian networks that encourage and support bicycle use and pedestrian activity; land use planning and urban design planning services including, developing plans that focus on community spaces relative to transportation systems with public spaces, buildings, and services in an urban environment; developing community plans that assess land use patterns and trends and the long-term impacts of proposed projects to the communities where they are located | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2021 |
| 045 | Environmental permitting, consulting on environmental regulatory matters, and assessment including conducting fieldwork and surveys, engaging with government agencies, leading regulatory processes, and developing permits for plans that impact natural and cultural resources in the environment; defining and evaluating alternatives, critically assess potential project impacts, and identify and develop design modifications and/or mitigation measures for wetlands and water resources, natural resources, cultural resources, land use, traffic, parking, and pedestrian and bicycling consideration; incorporating and utilizing environmental science and knowledge of sensitive environmental resources and anticipating compliance issues for integrating in transportation planning and construction projects | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2021 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |