Drawing for HALO POWER PAYMENTS

USPTO serial 90566449

HALO POWER PAYMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HALO POWER PAYMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. McCue

Michael J. McCue LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP3993 HOWARD HUGHES PARKWAY, SUITE 600LAS VEGAS, NV 89169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing a database in the field of customer loyalty programs in the casino industryACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing online non-downloadable computer software in the field of customer loyalty programs in the casino industry for use in database management, processing of rebates; providing a web hosting platform in the field of customer loyalty programs in the casino industry for loyalty program participants; Computer technical support services, namely, 24/7 service desk or help desk services for IT infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applications in the field of customer loyalty programs in the casino industry; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 5, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance