USPTO serial 90570054
ZIP LOXX HAIR EXTENSIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZIP LOXX HAIR EXTENSIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hauppauge, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua S. Frick
JOSHUA S. FRICK BARNES & THORNBURG LLPONE NORTH WACKER DRIVESUITE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair dye; hair relaxers; hair lighteners; hair texturizers; hair frosts; hair wax; hair colorants; hair sprays; hair lotion; hair bleach; hair tonics; hair oils; hair nourishers; hair lacquers; hair gels; hair fixers; hair decolorants; hair balsam; hair masks; hair mascara; hair mousse; hair shampoo; hair rinses; hair conditioners; hair glaze; hair emollients; hair color; hair butter; hair pomades; hair glitter; hair piece bonding glue; hair-washing powder; oils for hair conditioning; styling foam for hair; hair detangling preparations; adhesives for affixing false hair; cosmetic hair regrowth inhibiting preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated hair serums; medicated hair care preparations; hair growth stimulants | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Electric hair straightener; electric hair crimper; electric hair trimmers; electric hair clippers; hair cutting scissors; non-electric hair clippers; hair-removing tweezers; hand-operated hair clippers; electric hair curling irons; electrolysis apparatus for hair removal; bags and cases specially adapted for holding or carrying hair cutting scissors and shears; blades for electric razors; depilation appliances, electric and non- electric; curling tongs; crimping irons; flat irons | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Hairdressing appliances, namely, hair dryers and hair dryer diffusers; hair drying machines for beauty salon use | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hair brushes; hair picks; hair combs; hot hair brushes; electrically heated hair brushes; hair tinting bowls | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair weaves; hair elastics; hair netting; hair ribbons; hair grips; false hair; hair slides; hair rods; hair clamps; hair chopsticks; hair extensions; hair pieces; hair buckles; hair bows; hair pins; hair nets; hair bands; hair clips; hair barrettes; hair scrunchies; hair frosting caps; hair coloring caps; hair coloring foils; non-electric hair rollers; clam clips for hair; toupees; hair curl clips; hair curl papers; synthetic braiding hair; human braiding hair; electric hair waving implements; foam hair rollers; hair pieces and wigs; hair ornaments in the nature of hair wraps; waving pins for the hair; bridal headpieces in the nature of ornamental hair combs; wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hair; braids | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZIP LOXX, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named ZIP LOXX HAIR EXTENSIONS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |