USPTO serial 90572501
DEEP DISH MONSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6822776Status 780Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2022
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DEEP DISH MONSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER A PROSKEY
CHRISTOPHER A PROSKEY BROWN WINICK LAW FIRM666 GRAND AVESUITE 2000DES MOINES, IA 50309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cookies; Baked goods, bakery items, pastry goods, and deserts, namely, cookies, bakery desserts, confectionery items made of sugar, pastries; bakery goods; bakery pastries; confections, namely, confectionery items made of sugar; goods for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises, namely, cookies, bakery desserts, confectionery items made of sugar, pastries | ACTIVE | Oct 22, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2024 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | NRCS | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2022 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2022 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |