USPTO serial 90573539
QTG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QTG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Welding services of structural and mechanical steel tubes, support columns and custom finished and semi-finished products; Metal treatment structural and mechanical steel tubes, support columns and custom finished and semi-finished products; Powder coating services for structural and mechanical steel tubes, support columns and custom finished and semi-finished products; Treatment of materials, namely, tube bending of metals; Treatment of materials, namely, cutting of metals; Treatment of materials, namely, folding and bending of metals; Processing services, namely, custom manufacture of structural and mechanical steel tubes, support columns and custom finished and semi-finished products for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |