Drawing for PEAK HUMAN

USPTO serial 90574571

PEAK HUMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEAK HUMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandra Nicholson

Alexandra Nicholson Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1251 Avenue of the Americas, 21st FloorNew York, NY 10020United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, Shirts; t-shirts; sweatshirts; hoodies; caps being headwear; jackets; sweaters; shorts; tops, bottoms, socks, shoes; athletic wear in the nature of t-shirts, sweatshirts, shorts, socks, tights, leggings, and hatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2025EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2024EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 16, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2024TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 16, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 2, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 1, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2024TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 15, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 8, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 6, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 14, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 9, 2022WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2022WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 9, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance