CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE SOURCE

USPTO serial 90587388

THE SOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DIANE B MELNICK

DIANE B MELNICK PRACTUS LLPPO BOX 1101NEW YORK, NY 10028United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital media, namely, pre-recorded video cassettes, digital video discs, digital versatile discs, downloadable audio and video recordings, DVDs, and high- definition digital discs featuring award ceremonies in the fields of music, video, fashion, sports, lifestyle, politics and primary, secondary, and higher educationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2025EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2025EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 17, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 17, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2024XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2024GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2024GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2024CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 16, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 14, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 4, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 4, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 4, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 4, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 4, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 5, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 22, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 19, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance