USPTO serial 90587462
BERGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BERGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J Bellus
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD AND ROE1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | hand-operated machine tools; agricultural, gardening and forestry machines and apparatus; shears, electric; hand-held tools, other than hand-operated; mechanical cutting tools; power-operated saws; machine parts, namely, saw blades; machine parts, namely, blades; telescopic extension poles for the aforementioned tools and devices, as well as their respective attachments; sharpening steels for sharpening the aforementioned tools and devices; containers, adapted to the aforementioned goods, sold empty or filled; parts and accessories for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | hand-operated tools; agricultural, gardening and forestry implements and apparatus; garden tools, hand-operated; cutting tools, hand-operated; scissors; shears; tin snips; pruner heads; border shears; pruners; shear blades; knives; cutter knives; pruning knives; fruit pickers, hand-operated; hoes, hand-operated; hand tools, namely, ladles; hand tools, namely, shovels; thistle extractors, and-operated; asparagus knives; hatchets; cleavers; saws, hand-operated; blades for handsaws; telescopic extension bars for the aforementioned tools and devices, as well as their respective attachments; sharpening steels for sharpening the aforementioned tools and devices; equipment for arborists, namely, pruning saws, saws for cutting branches, pruning shears and felling hooks; telescopic poles as handle extensions for pruning saws, saws for cutting branches, pruning shears and felling hooks; sheaths and cases adapted to pruning saws, saws for cutting branches, pruning shears and felling hooks; tool pouches for attachment to tool belts; containers, adapted to the aforementioned goods, sold empty or filled; parts and accessories for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | Feb 2, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |