Drawing for INVISAGE

USPTO serial 90588204

INVISAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INVISAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MINDI M. RICHTER

MINDI M. RICHTER SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP101 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SUITE 2800TAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044dentist and orthodontic servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2022MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 25, 2022ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 25, 2022OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 25, 2022OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 10, 2021OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 8, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 19, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance