Drawing for CANDY.COM

USPTO serial 90591322

CANDY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VENGURLEKAR, SAGAR S
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANDY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

Jess M. Collen Rothwell,Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.3 Manhattanville RoadPurchase, NY 10577United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Auctioneering services, namely, auctioning of blockchain-based non-fungible tokens (NFTs)ACTIVE—
036Providing online information about blockchain-based non-fungible tokens (NFTs) exchange services; Providing online information about blockchain-based non-fungible tokens (NFTs) trading services; Trading of blockchain-based nonfungible tokens (NFTs); Commodity exchange services in the nature of blockchain-based non-fungible tokens (NFTs) exchange; Currency transfer in the nature of blockchain-based non-fungible tokens (NFTs) transfer servicesACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable web-based decentralized applications (DApps) for generating blockchain-based non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Providing online information about authentication of blockchain-based non-fungible tokens (NFTs)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 27, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 27, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 27, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2022ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2021AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2021PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance