USPTO serial 90597801
GHOULISH GOJI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALES, HEATHER ALISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GHOULISH GOJI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley P. Hartman
Bradley P. Hartman HARTMAN TITUS PLC2 N. Central Ave, Ste 1800Phoenix, AZ 85004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Smoking articles, namely, cigarette papers, cigarette rolling papers, pre-rolled cone cigarette papers, smoker's parchment cigarette papers, cigarette paper tips, filter cigarette tips, electric herb grinders for grinding smoking products in the nature of herbs, rotary herb grinders for grinding smoking products in the nature of herbs, cigarette rolling machines, smokers' rolling trays, wicks for smokers in the nature of hemp wicks for lighting, vaporizer pens being oral vaporizers for smokers, glass smoking tubes in the nature of tobacco water pipes, smoking pipes, glass smoking pipes, tobacco water pipes, and bongs in the nature of tobacco water pipes; all of the foregoing containing ingredients or intended to be used in connection with ingredients solely derived from hemp containing less than .3 percent delta-9 THC concentration on a dry weight basis; Smoking articles, namely, matches, electric herb grinders for grinding products in the nature of tobacco, rotary herb grinders for grinding smoking products in the nature of tobacco, tobacco grinders, ashtrays, refillable and non-refillable cigarette lighters not being for land vehicles, butane lighters for smokers, electronic lighters, and tobacco storage containers being jars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 29, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |