USPTO serial 90597930
CARET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 612
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederic G. Ludwig, III
Frederic G. Ludwig, III LUDWIG, APC12463 RANCHO BERNARDO ROAD, NO. 532SAN DIEGO, CA 92128United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for use in project management activities directed to establishing and achieving clean energy goals and accessing remotely stored data for such applications; providing temporary use of on-line nondownloadable software and applications for use in project management activities directed to establishing and achieving clean energy goals; providing technical information in the field of project management software directed to establishing and achieving clean energy goals and cloud computing in the field of project management activities directed to establishing and achieving clean energy goals; Scientific and technological research and analysis in the fields of climate change, energy efficiency, renewable energy, energy storage, distributed energy, green building and clean transportation; Technology planning and consulting services in the fields of climate change, energy efficiency, renewable energy, energy storage, distributed energy, green building and clean transportation | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2025 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | PBPO | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Oct 16, 2024 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |