USPTO serial 90597933
WHOLE HARVEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 2022
- Examiner
- LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with WHOLE HARVEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Kansas City, MO
North Kansas City, MO
NORTH KANSAS CITY, MO
NORTH KANSAS CITY, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle L. Elliott
Kyle L. Elliott SPENCER FANE LLP1000 WALNUT STREETSUITE 1400KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2140Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant and food preparation services featuring ready-to-eat plant based meals; subscription based meal planning services in digital form, accessible through the internet | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Imbue Resources, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Imbue Resources, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WHOLE HARVEST, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WHOLE HARVEST, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named WHOLE HARVEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2022 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2022 | AOUM | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP UPDATED MANUALLY | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 18, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2022 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |