USPTO serial 90598718
FIREMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARRETT, LEAH N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIREMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Camcorders; Eyeglasses; Headphones; Loudspeakers; Microphones; Smartphones; Colour document printers; Computer hardware and peripherals therefor; Crash helmets; Desktop computers; Garments and clothes for protection against fire; Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; Notebook computers; Power connectors; Smart watches; Tablet computers; Televisions and monitors; Video projectors; Virtual reality glasses; Wireless routers | ABANDONED | May 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |