USPTO serial 90600906
MOBILITY ECOSYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOBILITY ECOSYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis T. Perry
Louis T. Perry FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP300 N. MERIDIAN STREET, SUITE 2500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business project management services in the field of autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; business project management services featuring project planning in the field of autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2020 |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the field of product testing and vehicle roadworthiness testing of autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; technical verification and validation of product testing and roadworthiness testing relating to autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; technical consultation in the field of infrastructure development relating to autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; technical consultation in the field of internet of things and connected real estate relating to autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; data security consultancy in the field of autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; data security consultancy in the field of secure data communications relating to autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; technical data acquisition and collection, services in the field of autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; technical data indexing services in the field of autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; electronic data storage services in the field of autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; technical data analytics, technical data modeling and technical data simulation in the field of autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology; planning and design of autonomous vehicle testing facilities and autonomous vehicle testing parameters in the field of autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle technology, smart vehicles, and smart vehicle technology | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |