USPTO serial 90601328
LOTERIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOTERIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santiago de Queretaro, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mariana Paula Noli
Mariana Paula Noli NOLI IP SOLUTIONS PC1902 Wright PlaceSuite 200Carlsbad, CA 92008Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Foods based on cocoa, namely, cocoa spreads; Cereal-based snack foods for human consumption; Appetizers mainly consisting of confectionery, namely, confectionery namely chocolate; confectionery items covered with chocolate, namely, chocolate covered cookies; candy bars; chocolate bars; Cereal-based confectionery snack bars also containing nuts and dried fruits; chocolate-based drinks; cocoa-based drinks; Powdered cocoa for making drinks; chocolate; puddings; cocoa; chewable candy; candies, sweets and chewing gum; breads made of flour namely wheat flour; corn meal; Confectionery products, namely, candy; sauce; ice cream | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2025 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2025 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2025 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |