Drawing for VIRTUAL LOBBY

USPTO serial 90604498

VIRTUAL LOBBY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AURAND, MEGAN LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL LOBBY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc Baumgartner

Marc Baumgartner Baumgartner Patent Law2900 NW Clearwater Dr.Suite 200Bend, OR 97703

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Electronic transmission of information posted to usenet newsgroups and discussion groups via a global computer network; Electronic transmission of e-mail for information management; Electronic transmission of e-mail for educational information; Information transmission via electronic communications networks; Transmission of information by electronic communications networks; Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; Communication services, namely, providing electronic transmission of information stored in a database via interactively communicating computer systems; Providing electronic transmission of information to persons who are deaf or hearing impaired via the Internet, telephones and wireless devices; Wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimiles, images and informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 8, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 7, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 6, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 30, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 30, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 30, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 22, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 9, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 10, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 5, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 2, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance