USPTO serial 90606446
SYNTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYNTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah W. Matthews
Sarah W. Matthews Dentons Durham Jones Pinegar3301 NORTH THANKSGIVING WAY, SUITE 400LEHI, UT 84043United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable business intelligence software for grant and fund management, contract/project funding management, human ethics compliance, animal care compliance, and bio-safety compliance, downloadable computer software that provides real-time, integrated business and process management for grant management, contract/project funding management, human ethics compliance, animal care compliance, and bio-safety compliance, downloadable application programming interface (API) software for workflow management for grant and fund management, contract/project funding management, human ethics compliance, animal care compliance, and bio-safety compliance; none of the aforesaid goods in the field of accounting practice management and bookkeeping practice management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consultation in the field of grant and fund management, contract/project funding management, human ethics compliance, animal care compliance, and bio-safety compliance, digital business strategy development services in the field of grant and fund management, contract/project funding management, human ethics compliance, animal care compliance, and bio-safety compliance, retail services in relation to computer software, retail services relating to computer software, business project management for others in the field of grant and fund management, contract/project funding management, human ethics compliance, animal care compliance, and bio-safety compliance; none of the aforesaid services in the field of accounting practice management and bookkeeping practice management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | scientific and technological services, namely research and design in the field of computer hardware and software for business and government workflows for grant management, contract/project funding management, human ethics compliance, animal care compliance, and bio-safety compliance; design and development of computer hardware and software in the field of business and government workflows for grant management, contract/project funding management, human ethics compliance, animal care compliance, and bio-safety compliance; including computer and technology services, application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use as application programming interface (API) software, Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting software applications of others for use in foundations management, hosting of software for use in foundation management; none of the aforesaid services in the field of accounting practice management and bookkeeping practice management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |