Drawing for X25

USPTO serial 90610550

X25

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X25?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip L. Nulud, Esq.

Philip L. Nulud, Esq. BUCHALTER, APC1000 Wilshire BoulevardSuite 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer software for use in graph database management and graph data storing, processing and analytics, in the fields of supply chain operations and business analyticsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Aug 7, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 7, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 18, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 18, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 13, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 13, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 13, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 29, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 13, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 13, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 10, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
May 10, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 10, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 6, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 6, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 6, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance