USPTO serial 90613548
SKKN BY KIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH,APRIL K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKKN BY KIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER KO CRAFT
JENNIFER KO CRAFT DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC3883 HOWARD HUGHES PARKWAY, SUITE 800LAS VEGAS, NV 89169United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring hair, nail products, fragrances, perfumes, candles, vitamins and supplements, home, bedroom and bathroom furnishings; arranging and conducting special events for commercial, promotional or advertising purposes; advertising services, namely, promoting the brands, goods and services of others; endorsement services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; advertising, marketing and promotion services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |