USPTO serial 90615820
OPER8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPER8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Prince George (BC), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley M. Stohry
Bradley M. Stohry Reichel Stohry Dean LLP6151 Central AveIndianapolis, IN 46220United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications used to connect to smart factories, mills and processing plants; Downloadable mobile applications that provide augmented reality-based remote assistance to operations and service teams in factories, mills and processing plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consulting services relating to the optimization of operations in factories, mills and processing plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Remote coaching and training on maintenance and operation of machinery and software used in factories, mills and processing plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for augmented reality-based remote assistance used to deliver both customizable and engineered cloud-based insights and operational solutions for industry, leveraging data from smart connected machinery, databases, business and IT systems, and other technologies in the cloud and on the factory floor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 10, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |