Drawing for SMASH

USPTO serial 90617221

SMASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT M. DOUGLASS

SCOTT M. DOUGLASS BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC165 MADISON AVENUE, SUITE 2000MEMPHIS, TN 38103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Bags, namely, tote bags, athletic bags, backpacks, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, handbags, travelling bags; Luggage tags; Briefcases; Wallets; Credit card holders; Pet products, namely, collars, leashes, bandanas in the nature of pet clothingACTIVEJul 16, 2016
025Clothing, namely, denim jackets, denims, jackets, leggings, outerwear in the nature of pullovers and quarter-zip pullovers, coats, hats, beanies, gloves, shirts, socks, women's tops, sweaters, sweatshirts, toboggan hats, yoga pants, yoga shirts, athletic shirts, baseball caps, trucker hats, flat bill hats, collared shirts, hooded sweatshirts, long-sleeved shirts, polo shirts, short-sleeved shirts, sports shirts, tee shirts, baby clothes, namely, clothing layettesACTIVEJul 16, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 23, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 23, 2024EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Jun 22, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2023RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 21, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 21, 2023EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Sep 8, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 19, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 19, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 18, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2022RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Aug 18, 2022RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2022RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Aug 17, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 24, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2021TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jun 1, 2021PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance