USPTO serial 90617762
GEOMATIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINN, LAUREN DONGMI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEOMATIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
Robyn S. Lederman BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing services in the field of web site traffic optimization; consumer profiling based on the known or estimated geographical location of a mobile wireless device for commercial or marketing purposes; promoting the goods and services of others through search engine referral traffic analysis and reporting; analysis of market research data and statistics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing customer-defined generated content and content of others automatically selected and customized based on the known or estimated geographical location of a mobile wireless device | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SELLITIZE LTD
- Other trademarks owned by 12557142 Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 4355768 CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GEOMATIK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |