USPTO serial 90621121
PORTICO SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MALYSZEK, KIMBERLY RAY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PORTICO SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen E. Kabakoff
Stephen E. Kabakoff MILLER & MARTIN PLLC1200 VOLUNTEER BLDG., 832 GEORGIA AVENUEATTN: TRADEMARK PARALEGALCHATTANOOGA, TN 37402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Anti-breakage floor mats made primarily of rubber, textiles and plastic; Anti-fatigue floor mat; Anti-fatigue floor mats made primarily of rubber, textiles and plastic; Anti-slip floor mats made primarily of rubber, textiles and plastic; Anti-static floor mats made primarily of rubber, textiles and plastic; Coverings for existing floors; Door mats; Door mats of textile; Floor coverings; Floor coverings made of rubber, textiles and plastic; Floor coverings of rubber and synthetic rubber; Floor mat systems comprised primarily of floor mats made of Rubber, textiles and plastic; Floor mats; Floor mats featuring logos made primarily of rubber, textiles and plastic; Floor mats made of rubber, textiles and plastic; Floor mats used in industrial applications made primarily of rubber, textiles and plastic; Gymnasium floor coverings; Rubber mats; Vinyl floor coverings; Vinyl floor mats for indoor use | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2004 |
| 037 | Application of slip-resistant safety floor coatings and sealers; Application of slip-resistant safety floor sealers; Applying protective coatings to concrete, metal, plastic and rubber; Carpet and rug cleaning; Carpet cleaning; Installing carpet; Installing floor tile; Laying of carpet; Tile installation services | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2004 |
| 041 | Custom painting of artwork in the nature of designs or text on flooring products for others | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |