USPTO serial 90621330
V+ MARKETPLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with V+ MARKETPLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. BRANDON BROWNING
C. BRANDON BROWNING Maynard Nexsen PC1901 6th Avenue NorthSUITE 1700BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS), namely, providing non-downloadable software featuring an on-line marketplace for renters and property owners of goods and services for the purpose of advertising and purchasing or leasing property for rent, insurance, moving services, furniture, concierge services, transportation services and storage services; providing online, non-downloadable software, namely, software for providing on-line marketplace featuring property for rent, insurance, moving services, furniture, concierge services, transportation services and storage services, and software for use in real estate screening and leasing services in the field of residential for use in real property management, real time pricing and payment processing for use by insurance providers, moving services, furniture companies, concierge services, transportation services and storage services; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring non-downloadable software for automating real estate leasing workflows configured by the property owner | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2025 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 18, 2025 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |