USPTO serial 90626533
RS INDUSTRIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RS INDUSTRIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Northamptonshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra M. Koenig
SANDRA M. KOENIG FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVENUE, 5TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Engineering services; maintenance engineering services; reliability engineering services; research and development in the fields of maintenance engineering and reliability engineering; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in assessment of asset reliability and condition monitoring of machinery; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in analysis of machinery condition data; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in RAM modelling; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms using machine learning and AI applications for RAM modelling; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in assessment of asset reliability and condition monitoring of machinery; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in analysis of machinery condition data; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in RAM modelling; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning and AI for RAM modelling; software as a service (SAAS) provided in the form of applications, storage media for computer programs or algorithms for the software; cloud computing services featuring software for use in the assessment of asset reliability and condition monitoring of machinery; cloud computing services featuring software for use in analysis of machinery condition data; cloud computing services featuring software for use in RAM modelling; cloud computing services featuring software using machine learning and AI for RAM modelling; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in the assessment of asset reliability and condition monitoring of machinery; inspection services; testing services; analysis services; information, advice and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |