USPTO serial 90629272
VERB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trevor. A.Caudle, Esq.
TREVOR. A.CAUDLE, ESQ. TREVOR A. CAUDLE, ESQ. DBA TREVOR CAUDLE LAW PRACT350 BAY STREET, #100-363SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toothpaste; tooth cleaning tablets, tooth whitening preparations; mouthwashes, not for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable mobile application software that allows users to learn about, purchase, manage and use purchased oral care products, namely, electric toothbrushes, manual toothbrushes, toothbrush replacement heads, tongue brushes, dental floss, dental floss picks, toothpaste, tooth whitening preparations, and mouthwashes, not for medical purposes | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 010 | Tongue scrapers; tongue cleaners | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 021 | Electric toothbrushes; manual toothbrushes; toothbrush replacement heads; toothbrush cases; toothbrush holders; tongue brushes; dental floss; dental floss picks; dental care kit comprising of toothbrushes, dental floss, and toothpaste; interdental cleaners | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 030 | Chewing gum; mints for freshening breath | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 035 | Online and physical retail store services featuring oral care products, namely, electric toothbrushes, manual toothbrushes, toothbrush replacement heads, tongue brushes, tongue scrapers, tongue cleaners, dental floss, dental floss picks, toothpaste, tooth cleaning tablets, tooth whitening preparations, tongue and mouthwashes, not for medical purposes; On-line retail store services featuring subscription boxes containing oral care products, namely, electric toothbrushes, manual toothbrushes, toothbrush replacement heads, tongue brushes, tongue scrapers, tongue cleaners, dental floss, dental floss picks, toothpaste, tooth cleaning tablets, tooth whitening preparations, and mouthwashes, not for medical purposes | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aegle Ventures, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named VERB
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |