USPTO serial 90630144
BRAINCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAINCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. RICK TACHÉ
J. RICK TACHÉ BUCHALTER18400 VON KARMAN AVE, STE 800IRVINE, CA 92612-0514UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer operating programs and downloadable computer operating software for neuromodulation devices and devices for the analysis of brainwave activity; downloadable computer programs and software for the analysis of neurological disorders and brainwave activity | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, neuromodulation devices for the treatment of neurological disorders and electroencephalogram (EEG) apparatus for the analysis of brainwave activity | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical, scientific, and clinical research in the fields of neurological disorders, treatment of neurological disorders, neuromodulation technology, analysis of brainwave activity, and cognitive performance; online non-downloadable software for the analysis of neurological disorders and brainwave activity; software-as-a-service featuring operating programs and computer operating software for neuromodulation devices and devices for the analysis of brainwave activity | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical clinics in the field of analysis and treatment of neurological disorders, brainwave activity, and cognitive performance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 2, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |