USPTO serial 90631481
BENZENATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BENZENATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Québec, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Leonard
Michael J. Leonard FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 LENOX DRIVE, BLDG. 3LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Ultraviolet LiDAR laser detectors; electronic, optical, signaling and measuring equipment, apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic objects and persons detection laser sensors; downloadable software for use in leak detection and inspection with respect to oil and gas storage facilities, right of way (ROW) management, analysis and evaluation of natural hazards, changes to topography caused by human activity and natural forces, changes in objects positioning and land use; recorded and downloadable software for use in leak detection and inspection with respect to oil and gas storage facilities, right of way (ROW) management, analysis and evaluation of natural hazards, changes to topography caused by human activity and natural forces, changes in objects positioning and land use | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Geospatial analytics services, namely, provision of geospatial analysis in the nature of mapping services and data mining, namely, data mining and mapping services featuring 2D and 3D mapping operations, spatial statistics, surface analysis, network analysis, geo-visualization, geospatial computing, and geospatial intelligence; automated geospatial analytics services for use in protecting infrastructures; automated geospatial analytics services for use in identifying and evaluating potential risks and actions to mitigate risks; leak detection and inspection services of oil and gas pipeline; leak detection and inspection services with respect of oil, fuel and gas storage facilities; technical analysis and evaluation in the field of predictive analytics relating to infrastructure, right of way (ROW) management; technical analysis and evaluation of geospatial data to improve oil and gas pipeline and infrastructure integrity, safety and reliability; technical analysis and evaluation of changes to topography caused by human activity and natural forces to mitigate hazards and support compliance activities; technical analysis and evaluation in the field of right of way (ROW) management and natural hazard mitigation; automated three-dimensional geospatial analytics services for use in tracking, mapping and detecting changes in objects positioning and land use; providing online non-downloadable software for use in leak detection and inspection with respect to oil and gas storage facilities, right of way (ROW) management, analysis and evaluation of natural hazards, changes to topography caused by human activity and natural forces, changes in objects positioning and land use; updating and rental of software for data processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |