USPTO serial 90632969
LOCALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZARICK, DIANA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOCALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. DICKERSON, JR.
ROBERT W. DICKERSON, JR. BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP444 S. FLOWER ST., 24TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting, webcasting, streaming, and transmission of audio, video, subscription television programs, and video-on-demand content via the internet and electronic communications networks; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, images, graphics, audio, video, and multimedia by means of wired and wireless networks | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2019 |
| 042 | Providing a website that gives users the ability to publish their own text-based reading content, audio content, and audio-visual content; hosting an online website featuring artists and digital content creators; providing a website featuring technology that enables users to raise and transfer money to pay for media content; providing a website featuring technology that enables users to offer rewards to their customers; providing an interactive website featuring technology that enables users to share user-created media content, comment on media content, and exchange commentary concerning the same with one another | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |