USPTO serial 90633083
COMPLETIONS OPERATING PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SORIANO, JASMINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPLETIONS OPERATING PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie A. Gumm
Stephanie A. Gumm FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP300 N. MERIDIAN STREET, SUITE 2500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hardware and software systems designed as an interface between all services on a frac location that allows the remote monitoring and autonomous control of a fracing operation, comprised of computers, sensors (namely, pressure, position, level, flow, temperature, timing, rate and volume sensors), specialized sensor interface software and electronic control systems, all used in comprehensive remote fracing operations; computer software for the collection, aggregation, analysis and coordination of the fracing operation from third-party sensors, as well as hardware and software systems of all frac related equipment, to enable users to monitor and control comprehensive remote fracing operations via a single platform; computer software designed to collect sensor impulses, monitor and control automated frac equipment and provide users with information required to run real-time autonomous remote operations; computer software for the remote operation and control of automated equipment and systems used in connection with fracing operations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services for the remote monitoring and control of hardware and software used in comprehensive remote fracing operations; developing and providing an on-line non-downloadable dashboard for providing data, analysis, and metrics required for monitoring and controlling automated equipment on a frac location; Software as a Service services for use with a platform for providing real-time data, analysis, and metrics required for monitoring and controlling automated equipment on a frac location; Platform as a Service services for the remote monitoring and autonomous control of a fracing operation, comprised of computers, sensors (namely, pressure, position, level, flow, temperature, timing, rate and volume sensors), specialized sensor interface software and electronic control systems, all used in comprehensive remote fracing operations; Platform as a Service services for the collection, aggregation, analysis and coordination of the fracing operation from third-party sensors, as well as hardware and software systems of all frac related equipment, to enable users to monitor and control comprehensive remote fracing operations via a single platform; Platform as a Service services for collecting sensor impulses, to monitor and control automated frac equipment and provide users with information required to run real-time autonomous remote operations; Platform as a Service services for the remote operation and control of automated equipment and systems used in connection with fracing operations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |