Drawing for ORCUS

USPTO serial 90634916

ORCUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORCUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis F. Teran

Louis F. Teran Strategic Legal Counseling1055 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 500Pasadena, CA 91106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic mixed beverages except beersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 25, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 24, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 7, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance