Drawing for LOVEABLES

USPTO serial 90642452

LOVEABLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TARASCIO, MAUREEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOVEABLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Goldstein

Mark A. Goldstein SOCAL IP LAW GROUP LLP310 N. WESTLAKE BLVD., SUITE 120WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010fashion masks being sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; face coverings being sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; sanitary masks made of cloth for protection against viral infection; disposable sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; reusable sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; novelty sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; sanitary masks for protection against viral and bacterial infection; protective face masks for protection against viral and bacterial infection; face-protection shields for protection against viral and bacterial infection; personal protective equipment (PPE), namely, face and eye shields for protection against viral and bacterial infection; personal protective equipment (PPE), namely, protective gowns, bibs and coveralls for protection against viruses and bacteria; sanitary gloves for protection against viral and bacterial infection; personal protective equipment (PPE), namely, booties and foot coverings for protection against viruses and bacteriaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2024ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 9, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 16, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 15, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 13, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance